Riffing on the Molton “Pigdemic” cartoon controversy

In today’s issue, two Mountain Xpress contributors — the Asheville Disclaimer parody news and cartoonist Brent Brown — riff on the controversy over one of the most discussed and debated recent items to appear in the publication: Randy Molton’s May 6 “Pigdemic” cartoon.

Readers sounded off about the cartoon, which many deemed an offense against mountain culture for intimating that a mountain resident had sexual intercourse with livestock (specifically, a pig), in lengthy online discussions here, here and here.

Perhaps the discussion will take even more new directions, given the follow-up pieces by Brown (click here to see his cartoon) and the Disclaimer folks (click here for their bit).

Jon Elliston, managing editor

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Jon Elliston
Former Mountain Xpress managing editor Jon Elliston is the senior editor at WNC magazine.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Riffing on the Molton “Pigdemic” cartoon controversy

  1. Susannah G

    As a 7th generation Appalachian, I can say that the thing that offends me most about this controversy is the idea that I am a fragile oppressed minority in need of special protection. I wonder how many of the well meaning individuals who would protect my honor actually came from here or understand the culture. One of the greatest qualities of Southern Appalachian culture is the combination of humor and humility that allows us to laugh at ourselves freely. We as a people are more than strong enough to shrug off yet another silly cartoon.

    One thing I have observed in life is that ignorance does not have regional boundaries, and that perversion is universal. I can laugh at the idea of an Appalachian having relations with a pig, because I fully believe that northern farmers have done the same thing- in fact I believe bestiality has historically existed wherever beasts mix with man. Perhaps I have an unusual perspective on this, but really it’s only an extension of the well known internet “rule 34” which states “If it exists, there is porn of it”.

    In the weeks before this cartoon was printed I saw several online posts that insinuated the same thing about Hispanics and livestock, but of course that slipped under the local radar and was forgotten, and perhaps that was best. The most useful response to insult is to ignore it, rise above it, and move on- think how many more people have seen this cartoon now that there has been an outcry- if there had been no controversy it would have been forgotten in a day. How many more people have heard the phrase “nappy headed ho” because of controversy in the media, versus the number of people who would actually have listened to Don Imus’ radio program in the first place?

    I don’t believe that political correctness or sterilization of language has done anything whatsoever to help the groups it tries to protect, if anything it perpetuates the idea that some people will always be different and in need of special protection- in short PC speech control perpetuates the very stereotypes it claims to prevent, as well as focusing a spotlight on people’s individual pains, hurt that would best be forgotten and moved away from.

  2. Carl Crowder

    I remember a bit the Disclaimer did on women in business about a year or so ago. There was quite a stir as feminists objected. The Disclaimer sheepishly discontinued and appeared to be completely chastised. Personally, I don’t think this cartoon is insulting to local folks.

    But instead of the knee-jerk liberal decision to make fun of Dr Mumpower, it would’ve been cooler, and much more rebelulous to put in a prominent democrat. How about Judge Shirley Brown? She thinks of herself as a god of sorts and is the perfect foil for an ego deflating joke.

  3. Betty Cloer Wallace

    Susannah G wrote: ” The most useful response to insult is to ignore it (Pigdemic cartoon), rise above it, and move on- think how many more people have seen this cartoon now that there has been an outcry- if there had been no controversy it would have been forgotten in a day. How many more people have heard the phrase “nappy headed ho” because of controversy in the media, versus the number of people who would actually have listened to Don Imus’ radio program in the first place?”

    Remember, Susannah, that Imus was fired for making that “nappy headed ho” comment, and he will certainly not be so blatantly racist in such a manner again. It will happen again, of course, but his firing did dampen the racism coming out of many mouths. Same thing with Kramer’s racist language in the LA comedy club. Same thing with the closing of the old Sambo’s Pancake Houses.

    Southern Appalachian people have tried to overlook blatant cultural stereotypes for over a century to no avail. Trying to ignore the insult and taking a “step-n-fetchit” response has reinforced it and perpetuated it in the minds of so many people that they think it is all right to continue the insult.

    Simply ignoring it and allowing it to continue in such a blatant manner is an awful legacy of submission to leave to our children and grandchildren.

  4. Al Cottingham

    Betty, I hear your point. But aren’t we joining the “victim” parade here? You know, the liberal victimization whining show. To fix it, just put up a fence on the Mason-Dixon line and don’t let any more yankees in. And if you think about it, having a “red” neck comes from working hard out in the sun. Pasty-faced yankee big city people are too lazy to work and just look for ways to leech off the rest of us through welfare. And if these yankee transplants think their home places are so special, why did they move here in the first place? And I don’t see anybody moving to the NE states or Chicago. Nuf said. The South rules!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.