A week later, effect of Amendment One still unclear

A week after the passage of Amendment One, declaring “that marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized” in North Carolina, its impacts on everything from domestic partner benefits to protections for unmarried couples remain unclear, with both local and state legal experts scrambling to make sense of the new rule.

“Nobody knows anything for certain,” Cheryl Howell, a professor of public law at the UNC School of Government, tells Xpress. “Nobody has any idea what that language means, it’s going to be a matter for the courts to sort out.”

“The language of the amendment uses that term ‘domestic legal union’” Howell adds. “The issue is that we have no law in the state that defines the term ‘domestic legal union,’ so there’s this prohibition of the state recognizing a domestic legal union and the only thing we know about that term is that it includes marriage. What it means beyond marriage will be up to the court to determine.”

“I work with our district court judges, and there’s a lot of issues coming up with regards to marriage and domestic violence” Howell also notes.

The city of Asheville currently offers domestic partner benefits and a domestic partner registry, as well as a variety of protections for LGBT employees, including the use of sick time to care for “significant others.” The partner benefits are recent, and no city employees have signed up for them yet. Like Howell, City Attorney Bob Oast says the effects are largely unknown.

“We are considering the effect of it, that involves me talking to folks from the School of Government and to attorneys at other localities with similar benefits,” Oast tells Xpress. “We don’t have any answers yet.”

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “A week later, effect of Amendment One still unclear

  1. Robert White

    Of course it is unclear – it was unlcear before the election because key things were left out by the policians who spoke out about it.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.