The PBS has seen it fit to describe the war in Afghanistan as Obama’s War…I think there is some kind of weird subconscious manipulation going on here. Vietnam wasn’t Kennedy’s War…The Korean War wasn’t Eisenhower’s war..Why do we need to label this Obama’s War? As far as I can tell Obama seems like the most peaceful guy we’ve had in the oval office for quite a while..I think he would withdraw the troops from Afghanistan if it wouldn’t cause a bigger mess… check out the link…I have to ask…
Why is the media painting this as Obama’s War when he obviously is a victim of his circumstance..hell he was a 37 year old doe eyed community worker when the 9/11 happened..
The official strategy, which Obama announced in March, is to focus more narrowly than in the past on disrupting and defeating Al Qaeda, because that’s our main strategic interest here. That’s where the problem started. That’s the threat to us. And I think Obama wanted to keep the public invested in this war. The only way to do that was to remind them that it was about Al Qaeda at the beginnin, and it’s still about Al Qaeda.
But the problem with that is it leads to a whole series of consequences which take you well beyond defeating Al Qaeda to defeating, or at least pushing back, their allies, the Taliban, who are a sort of diffuse and multi-headed force, and to stabilizing and helping to shore up not just one but two governments, two weak and perhaps even collapsing governments, one in Kabul, the other in Islamabad.