Jason Ross Martin - 19 October 2009 10:44 PM
Mat:
Andy’s band is fabulous.
Assuming this were true, it has no bearing on this thread. No one mentioned his band except you. If and when his band is covered in a thread, I will take that opportunity to discuss his band. This is not that time. Stay on topic.
I have pity for you and your negative perspective.
I love it when people say that. It is almost as amusing as “I am going to pray for you.”
I also enjoy how the assumption is always made that either:
A) someone who goes off on something like spelling, grammar or formatting is “negative,” and/or
B) telling someone that they are being negative is going to automatically shame them or make them have some sort of epiphany about their life.
Or maybe it is used just to simply say “I have nothing constructive to say, so I shall reach for a cliche.”
Your attempt at a pithy put-down really is embarrassing, for you. If only you knew what an intellect Andy Palast is, you would never toss around such drivel towards him.
I am deeply and truly sorry. In the future, I will make sure my drivel is up to the standards of intellect that Mr. Palast deserves.
You, however, can still receive the standard drivel.
You know why you are drowning on this board with pathetic content? Because when someone like Andy appears, you boil over with schlock posts, like those you abhor from others.
I don’t think you read this forum very much. If you did, you would realize that you pretty much just called Andy’s post “schlock.” I have never complained about the “pathetic content” on this board.
I can tolerate a lot of things. I can handle when certain men dressed as nuns go on a binge and post insane ramblings. I can handle it when four others go ape poop for three days about said ramblings. I can handle it when someone comes in with some half-baked notion of the “lives of quiet desperation” led by the grunts of the service industry, while failing completely to realize how utterly misplaced most of his angst is. I can handle it when the replies to me instantly wander into the field of “anal-retentive” and “negative” (again, I recognize that as a tactic to avoid addressing an issue by dressing up a participant in the conversation as having some sort of dysfunction - one which prevents them from seeing the intellect inherent in what they are saying: as though posting ten paragraphs of what appears to be a regurgitation of a discussion from a college humanities classroom in one single, unbroken wall of text isn’t doing that for them).
So, yes. When someone like Andy appears and wants to be taken seriously, I tend to demand a tiny bit of common sense to go with the “intellect.” If Andy wants me to take his posts seriously then Andy needs to learn how to format. Sure, he can spell and he seems to have a pretty good grasp of syntax and grammar but he apparently does not have an “enter” key on his keyboard. (Protip: There are two of them; if one breaks, try the other).
Now since we are still discussing walls of text and the inability or unwillingness to use the key that inserts line breaks into text, let’s go ahead and mention the fact that I, at times, have posted walls of text here. Are they serious essays on the nature of the dehumanizing effects of menial wage slavery jobs on workers? No. They are stream of consciousness bits of fluff. I don’t take them seriously and I don’t expect anyone else to.
Then again, I don’t take myself too seriously at all. If I did, I might go around monogramming my posts on a forum.
JRM
Did you seriously just monogram your post? I can’t handle that.