mountainX.com > Forum Home  >  Community  >  Farm & Garden  >  Thread
Forum Rules

 
Debunking sustainable food myths
 
Oct 19, 2009  10:24 PM
Forum Xtremist
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8345
Joined  12/2008

To produce large quantities of food cheaply, companies look for economies of scale, using chemicals to control weeds and pests instead of more labor-and space-intensive organic options and often packing animals into very crowded spaces.

The cost of this cheap food trickles down in many ways, including food safety issues (14 Americans die every day as a result of food-borne illness); increased use of antibiotics (more than half of all antibiotics used in North America are fed to livestock and 90 per cent are administered to make animals grow faster, not to treat infections); and water pollution (The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates agriculture is responsible for 70 per cent of the country’s water pollution).

“These things have to be important to you in order to get past the price you pay,” Sirois says. “We seem to have no problem paying $50 for Internet each month and $80, $90, $100 for a cellphone each month, so why do we want to pay the least possible for food?”

“We can’t seem to make the connection on a broad scale between food and health. Yes, we eat cheaply and poorly, but it adds to this incredible health expenditure on the other end,” Sirois says.


http://www.calgaryherald.com/life/food/Debunking+sustainable+food+myths/2086662/story.html

 
Reply #1 • Oct 22, 2009  09:00 AM
Avatar
MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1716
Joined  06/2009

This comes as no surprise. I just think that it’s the nature of capitalism and food as big business. When you stop knowing who grows your food and it gets cheaper in the process, you probably stop caring about what is in it. I’m no armchair shrink, but there has to be a correlation.

Signature 

My blog, updated daily!
Fuzztone Zine, updated every other day!
My twitter page, rarely updated!
My website, never updated!

 
Reply #2 • Oct 22, 2009  10:39 PM
Forum Xtremist
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8345
Joined  12/2008

yes, but the entire article goes further than just the snippet provided here.

it’s really about getting people to better understand the true value of their food. sort of like when ‘poor’ people buy shit food, but spend money on an xbox or a car.

 
Reply #3 • Oct 22, 2009  11:17 PM
Avatar
MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1392
Joined  04/2007

I think that is why a movement like permaculture has such an important role to play in helping to provide systems that offset large scale ag biz ....

the sooner we start landscaping our properties with edible plants and trees and develop perennial food supplies, the sooner we will ween ourselves of non sustaining ag practices .... though the ag producers have been providing food items at a lower cost .... what is really happening is that they are destroying the valuable topsoil in the process and demanding water resources in a very inefficient ways

Signature 

possibly, maybe

 
Reply #4 • Oct 22, 2009  11:20 PM
Forum Xtremist
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8345
Joined  12/2008

and in addition to the taking of resources like soila nd water, that ‘cheap produce’ is often also heavily subsidized with taxpayer money.