mountainX.com > Forum Home  >  Community  >  Internet & Technology  >  Thread
Forum Rules

This thread has multiple pages: 1 of 2 |  
1
Google Chrome
 
Sep 08, 2008  08:18 PM
Avatar
MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1736
Joined  07/2008

Anybody tried Google Chrome?  I’m way too comfy with Firefox to change but I hear it works well.

http://www.google.com/chrome/index.html?hl=en&brand=CHMI&utm_source=en-et&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=en


bowtothefox7mw.gif

Signature 

“We create our own unhappiness. The purpose of suffering is to help us understand we are the ones who cause it.” ~ Willie Nelson

 
Reply #1 • Sep 08, 2008  10:42 PM
Avatar
Moderator
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  851
Joined  02/2007

I haven’t tried it either for the very same reasons, Tom.  As it comes out there are some huge vulnerabilities starting to show up…

http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1858&tag=nl.e550

Signature 

my photoblog, zenography
my word blog zenscription
17,000+ photos of mine at my Flickr site

 
Reply #2 • Sep 09, 2008  04:35 PM
Avatar
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7058
Joined  01/2007

I’ve been using it a little, and it lives up to the hype. It looks great, and its very user-friendly. Pages load faster and generally don’t hang on anything as they load. I expect there will always be some kind of threat in using any kind of browser on sites with malicious content, but Chrome was designed with that in mind.

There’s also a great Scott McCloud-drawn online comic explaining how it works, and what steps Google has taken to decrease security threats. You can read it here:  http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/index.html

I’m sure the bugs will be popping up for the next few months—that’s the whole point of the Beta release, really—I think it’ll soon be giving Firefox a run for its money. I doubt Internet Explorer followers will give their Microsoft-approved browser up so easily, but if the security “jail” they’ve created works as well as they’re claiming it does, even that could change.

That said, I’ve spent a fair amount of time building websites recently, and Chrome is all but useless for that. Since it’s so much more advanced than Firefox 3 or I.E. 7, some things that wouldn’t normally work due to bad markup actually work fine in Chrome. That’s great for Chrome users, but awful for anyone who visits one of those sites in Firefox and can’t get the page to load right because something is wrong with the javascript.

Signature 

Magneto was right

 
Reply #3 • Sep 10, 2008  12:13 AM
MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1569
Joined  04/2007

how about all the favorite plugins ?

Signature 

my coffee is gettin cold

 
Reply #4 • Sep 10, 2008  12:20 PM
Avatar
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7058
Joined  01/2007
tattttms - 10 September 2008 12:13 AM

how about all the favorite plugins ?

I’m not much on plug-ins—except for Ad-Block on Firefox—but I do know that Google has been trying to get developers to write plug-ins for Chrome. It’s open-source and built around an existing web toolkit, so I’d imagine there will be plenty of them soon.

Signature 

Magneto was right

 
Reply #5 • Sep 10, 2008  09:35 PM
Avatar
Elite Poster
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  881
Joined  04/2007

I’ve been playing with Google Chrome also ... it does seem better on video but Firefox remains my main browser precisely because of all the plugins.

But if you want to try some video, I just got my setup of Red5 Flash media server working under Ubuntu!!!

kinda proud!

here’s a test page:

http://nuoj.com:5080/test.html

 
Reply #6 • Sep 11, 2008  10:03 AM
MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1569
Joined  04/2007

ralph, nice listen demo ... man did that load fast on this machine ...

Signature 

my coffee is gettin cold

 
Reply #7 • Sep 11, 2008  10:25 AM
Avatar
Elite Poster
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  881
Joined  04/2007

thanks, tattttms ... yep, loading fast is the whole concept of streaming instead of progressive downloads and I think I’ve got it working pretty well. ;-)

 
Reply #8 • Sep 11, 2008  12:07 PM
MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1569
Joined  04/2007

Though you have a better face for radio, you still did a good job on the graphics and on the loading speed of your server.

I may have to rationalize a new machine soon and when I do I think I am going to give ubuntu a run with as much open source as I can find ...

I’d really like to see how far I can go with all free all open source on one machine ...

(Edited: 11 September 2008 03:38 PM by tatTttms)
Signature 

my coffee is gettin cold

 
Reply #9 • Dec 08, 2009  01:58 PM
Championship MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2867
Joined  04/2007

It’s finally here: Google Chrome for Mac. Available today in beta!

Hi there,

Thanks for signing up to hear from us regarding Google Chrome for Mac! We’re excited to let you know that Google Chrome is now available in beta for Mac OS X.

Here are a few fun facts from us on the Google Chrome for Mac team:

73,804 lines of Mac-specific code written
29 developer builds
1,177 Mac-specific bugs fixed
12 external committers and bug editors to the Google Chrome for Mac code base, 48 external code contributors
64 Mac Minis doing continuous builds and tests
8,760 cups of soft drinks and coffee consumed
4,380 frosted mini-wheats eaten

Thanks for waiting and we hope you’ll give Google Chrome for Mac a whirl.

 
Reply #10 • Dec 08, 2009  03:21 PM
Avatar
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7058
Joined  01/2007

If Chrome had Firefox’s range of plugins, it would be unbeatable. Sadly, it doesn’t.

Signature 

Magneto was right

 
Reply #11 • Dec 08, 2009  03:40 PM
Avatar
MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1883
Joined  10/2007

They are rolling out some extensions:

https://chrome.google.com/extensions

But nothing for Mac users.

Signature 

All of us failed to match our dreams of perfection. So I rate us on the basis of our splendid failure to do the impossible.

 
Reply #12 • Dec 08, 2009  08:36 PM
Avatar
Moderator
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1162
Joined  09/2008

I’d like to see if Google ever allows an Adblock-type extension. I doubt they ever will since they are an advertising company, which is why I will stick to Firefox.

 
Reply #13 • Dec 09, 2009  01:23 PM
Avatar
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7058
Joined  01/2007
The Imposter - 08 December 2009 08:36 PM

I’d like to see if Google ever allows an Adblock-type extension. I doubt they ever will since they are an advertising company, which is why I will stick to Firefox.

There are a few that have been developed already, although I haven’t tested any of them out yet.

AdThwart: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/cfhdojbkjhnklbpkdaibdccddilifddb

AdBlock (doesn’t appear to be the same as the FF add-on): https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom

And also a FlashBlock extension: https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gofhjkjmkpinhpoiabjplobcaignabnl

I didn’t see a NoScript equivalent, but I’d guess there’s one in the works at least.

Signature 

Magneto was right

 
Reply #14 • Dec 09, 2009  11:17 PM
Avatar
MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1883
Joined  10/2007

apparently it’s rippin’ fast.

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9142004/Safari_edges_Chrome_in_Mac_speed_trials

Signature 

All of us failed to match our dreams of perfection. So I rate us on the basis of our splendid failure to do the impossible.

 
Reply #15 • Dec 09, 2009  11:49 PM
Championship MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2867
Joined  04/2007

I thought it seemed slower than I was used to in Safari.

This thread has multiple pages: 1 of 2 |  
1