mountainX.com > Forum Home  >  Community  >  Media & Journalism  >  Thread
Forum Rules

This thread has multiple pages: 8 of 9 |  
8
The Death Rattle of Print Journalism
 
Reply #106 • Apr 07, 2009  04:18 PM
Avatar
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5596
Joined  01/2007

Crisis over, everyone. The East Bay Express figured it out. Newspapers will be fine now.

Who knew it could be so simple?

Signature 

“What will you do with free will?”—Uatu the Watcher

 
Reply #107 • Apr 07, 2009  04:38 PM
Avatar
Championship MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2301
Joined  04/2007

Many of us did.

We were stymied in all our attempts, however.

 
Reply #108 • Apr 09, 2009  11:37 PM
Forum Xtremist
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8349
Joined  12/2008

http://thetyee.ca/cms/Mediacheck/2009/04/01/ReImagineNews/

Let’s Re-imagine Journalism
Amidst crisis, explore opportunity.
The media meltdown offers an opportunity for creative solutions.


At a critical time when the new media environment is being molded and the traditional news industry is in a state of decline, creative approaches to journalism are urgently needed. Since my last column on the decline of journalism, the bleeding of jobs and the threat of local news outlets fading to ‘black’ continues. Along with a slew of recent layoffs, Canwest is attempting to sell off parts of its media empire and CTV is simply closing stations down. Journalists have even become active in reporting about the slaughtering of the media industry, resulting in what TheTyee describes as a “collective auto-obituary.”

If news financed by big business is failing, what alternatives do we have?

Public backing of public journalism

The Conservatives appear determined to cut financial support for, and/or further commercialize, the CBC and other public broadcasters. The CBC is a pillar of our media system and needs increased financial support from the public, not more cuts and uncertainty.

In addition, funds such as the Canadian Magazine Fund and Telefilm could support newsgathering and reporting and add to the range of eligible projects to include online independent journalism. This could be combined with a new Internet Broadcast Fund, supported by a telecom levy, something I’ve called for in another column.

Having a more directed fund is not unheard of. The BBC is funded in part by television license fees. The acclaimed Australian community broadcasting sector is funded in part by federal grants via the Community Broadcasting Foundation. In the Netherlands, non-profit member-based media associations receive government funding and airtime in proportion to their membership numbers. The objective of the program is to ensure that the diversity of the multicultural society is represented in public discourse.

In conjunction with other support mechanisms, we could also use the “Local Programming Improvement Fund” (LPIF). The CRTC announced the LPIF last year, which will be supported by a percentage of cable and satellite revenues and is expected to amount to $60 million in the first year.


Regardless of the sources of financial support, it is essential that all available funds go directly to media makers and media outlets for news production, and not be handed over to big media with no strings attached. The last thing we need is for public funds to be used to compensate for financial decisions of the Aspers.

Community-supported journalism

Foundations, labour groups, NGOs and individuals can also play a role in renewing journalism by financing public trusts or specific charitable journalism funds that could support innovative journalism projects. Barbara Yaffe at the Vancouver Sun recently asserted that while running newspapers as public trusts might work in the U.S., it won’t work in Canada because we lack major endowment funds. While our philanthropy sector is notably smaller than that of the U.S., we are certainly not without civil society organizations and philanthropists who could step up to support journalism in this critical period.

There are several journalism experiments already supported from these sources. The independent, non-profit online news organization, Rabble.ca for example, combines support from individuals, and advertising with funds provided by a group of “Sustaining Partners” made up of NGOs, unions and foundations. The Tyee has a specific charitable investigative journalism fellowship fund that supports some of its journalism. Recently, Saskatchewan saw the launch of an independent provincial newspaper called the Sasquatch, which is to be run and supported by the non-profit magazine publisher Briarpatch Inc. THIS Magazine and The Walrus are also published by charitable foundations.

While it’s true that these outlets need more support, Yaffe’s dismissal of community-supported journalism is premature at best. Rather than announcing that it’s dead on arrival, we should be challenging both individuals and civil society organizations to ramp up their support for independent public service journalism in this critical time.

Journalists in the driver’s seat

One way we can help fill the current void in journalism is to support initiatives where journalists themselves are taking over media production. For example, the Dominion Newspaper is attempting to form a media cooperative that will produce a national newspaper. Both readers and media workers will be members and given a voting share in the coop. They also plan to help fill the void in local journalism by launching local branches that would both function autonomously and produce local stories as well as contribute to a kind of confederation-based national newspaper….

....(continued at link)

 
Reply #109 • Apr 21, 2009  05:16 PM
Avatar
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5596
Joined  01/2007

It looks like it’s going to be pretty rough for Gannett this year.

Gannett posted a 60-percent drop in first-quarter profit on Thursday on a lower advertising revenue, kicking off what might be one of the worst quarters yet for newspaper publishers.

The largest U.S. newspaper chain owner and publisher of USA Today, the nation’s largest daily paper by circulation, reported net income of $77.7 million, or 34 cents a share, down from $191.8 million, or 84 cents a share, a year ago.

Revenue fell almost 18 percent to $1.38 billion.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/30245361

What’ll be the impact from all this on the not-exactly thriving Asheville Citizen-Times?

Signature 

“What will you do with free will?”—Uatu the Watcher

 
Reply #110 • Apr 27, 2009  11:28 AM
Avatar
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5596
Joined  01/2007

Editor & Publisher’s most recent circulation report shows big losses for the top 25 papers. To those of you outside of the news industry, circulation is extremely important, because it’s the primary number advertisers look at. Less people reading the paper means less of an audience for the ad.

This is likely to become big news: It was on the Drudge Report this morning.

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003966608

Here are the stats on the top ten publications ...

USA TODAY—2,113,725 – (-7.46%)
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL—2,082,189—0.61%
THE NEW YORK TIMES—1,039,031—(-3.55%)
LOS ANGELES TIMES—723,181—(-6.55%)
THE WASHINGTON POST—665,383—(-1.16%)

DAILY NEWS (NEW YORK)—602,857—(-14.26%)
NEW YORK POST—558,140—(-20.55%)
CHICAGO TRIBUNE—501,202—(-7.47%)
HOUSTON CHRONICLE—425,138—(-13.96%)
THE ARIZONA REPUBLIC—389,701—(-5.72%)

Signature 

“What will you do with free will?”—Uatu the Watcher

 
Reply #111 • May 07, 2009  04:25 PM
Elite Poster
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1000
Joined  08/2007
Steve Shanafelt - 21 April 2009 05:16 PM

It looks like it’s going to be pretty rough for Gannett this year.

Gannett posted a 60-percent drop in first-quarter profit on Thursday on a lower advertising revenue, kicking off what might be one of the worst quarters yet for newspaper publishers.

The largest U.S. newspaper chain owner and publisher of USA Today, the nation’s largest daily paper by circulation, reported net income of $77.7 million, or 34 cents a share, down from $191.8 million, or 84 cents a share, a year ago.

Revenue fell almost 18 percent to $1.38 billion.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/30245361

What’ll be the impact from all this on the not-exactly thriving Asheville Citizen-Times?

Couple thoughts on this. First the ACT is dying as are most dailies unless they can find someway to reinvent themselves. Second, the reason Gannett continues to make a profit is because they place the USA Today in nearly every hotel in the country (and they are not giving them away).

(Edited: 07 May 2009 04:28 PM by travelah)
Signature 

What an irelevant bunch of discombobulated morons you ‘tards can be at times. Travelah is a conservative ideologue and a screen name for A.M. Mallett who posts for the intellectual challenge of the political or social topic and for no other reason on this board. Travelah has no sockpuppets, is not in the employ of political operatives and doesn’t give a sack of chit if you believe otherwise. He does care about the state of your souls

- Shalomnic Yahoo (somebody elses sockpuppet)

 
Reply #112 • May 15, 2009  05:17 PM
Avatar
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5596
Joined  01/2007

Ann Arbor News is going to online-oriented, twice-weekly in print next month: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D986QQ1O0&show_article=1

Tucson Citizen is going online only, and cutting news out entirely in favor of opinion and commentary: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D986QL9O2&show_article=1

Rough times for print. I’m expecting a wave of these announcements by the end of summer.

Signature 

“What will you do with free will?”—Uatu the Watcher

 
Reply #113 • May 19, 2009  12:21 AM
Forum Xtremist
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8349
Joined  12/2008

This will work out well once they ban the public internet, and we all get our news from the DC branch of CSNBFoxTube.  No more messy second opinions! Streamlined truth!

 
Reply #114 • May 19, 2009  12:42 AM
Avatar
MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1137
Joined  04/2008
travelah - 07 May 2009 04:25 PM
Steve Shanafelt - 21 April 2009 05:16 PM

It looks like it’s going to be pretty rough for Gannett this year.

Gannett posted a 60-percent drop in first-quarter profit on Thursday on a lower advertising revenue, kicking off what might be one of the worst quarters yet for newspaper publishers.

The largest U.S. newspaper chain owner and publisher of USA Today, the nation’s largest daily paper by circulation, reported net income of $77.7 million, or 34 cents a share, down from $191.8 million, or 84 cents a share, a year ago.

Revenue fell almost 18 percent to $1.38 billion.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/30245361

What’ll be the impact from all this on the not-exactly thriving Asheville Citizen-Times?

Couple thoughts on this. First the ACT is dying as are most dailies unless they can find someway to reinvent themselves. Second, the reason Gannett continues to make a profit is because they place the USA Today in nearly every hotel in the country (and they are not giving them away).

I think that will change-stayed in the Louisville Hyatt for most of last week. They had free WSJ and NYT for guests and the night clerk said the hotel wasn’t paying for them.

The Super 8 in Clemmons still does the McPaper thing, but it won’t last past the contract.

Signature 

“because I am having a clash with a headless dog, seize him when he comes and release me”

 
Reply #115 • May 19, 2009  07:53 PM
Elite Poster
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1000
Joined  08/2007
Mr. Yuck - 19 May 2009 12:42 AM
travelah - 07 May 2009 04:25 PM
Steve Shanafelt - 21 April 2009 05:16 PM

It looks like it’s going to be pretty rough for Gannett this year.

Gannett posted a 60-percent drop in first-quarter profit on Thursday on a lower advertising revenue, kicking off what might be one of the worst quarters yet for newspaper publishers.

The largest U.S. newspaper chain owner and publisher of USA Today, the nation’s largest daily paper by circulation, reported net income of $77.7 million, or 34 cents a share, down from $191.8 million, or 84 cents a share, a year ago.

Revenue fell almost 18 percent to $1.38 billion.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/30245361

What’ll be the impact from all this on the not-exactly thriving Asheville Citizen-Times?

Couple thoughts on this. First the ACT is dying as are most dailies unless they can find someway to reinvent themselves. Second, the reason Gannett continues to make a profit is because they place the USA Today in nearly every hotel in the country (and they are not giving them away).

I think that will change-stayed in the Louisville Hyatt for most of last week. They had free WSJ and NYT for guests and the night clerk said the hotel wasn’t paying for them.

The Super 8 in Clemmons still does the McPaper thing, but it won’t last past the contract.

The local Hyatt might not be paying but I suspect there is a corporate funnel somewhere. In any event, I have been seeing the WSJ popping up a lot now too.

Signature 

What an irelevant bunch of discombobulated morons you ‘tards can be at times. Travelah is a conservative ideologue and a screen name for A.M. Mallett who posts for the intellectual challenge of the political or social topic and for no other reason on this board. Travelah has no sockpuppets, is not in the employ of political operatives and doesn’t give a sack of chit if you believe otherwise. He does care about the state of your souls

- Shalomnic Yahoo (somebody elses sockpuppet)

 
Reply #116 • May 23, 2009  03:21 PM
Forum Xtremist
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8349
Joined  12/2008

nobody really reads the usatoday other than you travlhahaha

 
Reply #117 • May 23, 2009  07:27 PM
Elite Poster
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1000
Joined  08/2007
The (PFKaP) - 23 May 2009 03:21 PM

nobody really reads the usatoday other than you travlhahaha

I don’t have time in the mornings to read it.

Signature 

What an irelevant bunch of discombobulated morons you ‘tards can be at times. Travelah is a conservative ideologue and a screen name for A.M. Mallett who posts for the intellectual challenge of the political or social topic and for no other reason on this board. Travelah has no sockpuppets, is not in the employ of political operatives and doesn’t give a sack of chit if you believe otherwise. He does care about the state of your souls

- Shalomnic Yahoo (somebody elses sockpuppet)

 
Reply #118 • May 23, 2009  09:56 PM
Forum Xtremist
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8349
Joined  12/2008

cuz yr such a bizzy guy.

 
Reply #119 • Jun 24, 2009  07:03 PM
Avatar
Administrator
RankRankRankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5596
Joined  01/2007

After 174 years, the Ann Arbor News is shutting down print publication altogether starting next month. The entire staff is being let go, and a new online media company formed from the ashes of the old, AnnArbor.com, will be accepting applications, with around a $20K pay cut for average reporter salary.

http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=123&aid=165290

Also, Gannettblog is reporting that Gannett is likely to lay off around 4,500 jobs on or around July 8.

http://gannettblog.blogspot.com/2009/06/dow-jones-paidcontent-advance-layoff.html

(Edited: 24 June 2009 07:19 PM by Steve Shanafelt)
Signature 

“What will you do with free will?”—Uatu the Watcher

 
Reply #120 • Jun 25, 2009  04:35 PM
Avatar
Championship MX Boarder
RankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2635
Joined  05/2009

wow..Just in the last few months I found myself using the computer instead of picking up a hard copy of the MX…I’ve always been impressed by the local publications..put a nice touch to our fair city…they’ll be more trees…

Signature 

Have we not come to such an impasse in the modern world that we must love our enemies - or else? The chain reaction of evil - hate begetting hate, wars producing more wars - must be broken, or else we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation.
Martin Luther King, Jr.

check out ..All About Richey, All the Time.. http://www.mountainx.com/forums/viewthread/2237/

This thread has multiple pages: 8 of 9 |  
8