Directed by: Terrence Malick
Starring: Richard Gere, Brooke Adams, Sam Shepard, Linda Manz, Robert J. Wilke
I didn’t see Terrence Malick Days of Heaven when it came out in 1978. I hadn’t liked Malick first film, Badlands (1973). I wasn’t drawn to this. The title didn’t appeal to me. Nothing that I’d read appealed to me. I didn’t care for the poster — even the font used for the title did nothing for me. In fact, it wasn’t till last week that I caught up with it, and I suspect my reaction to it at this late date — especially after seeing The Tree of Life — is markedly different than it would have been in 1978. I can only guess, but I imagine that my 1978 take would have been a mix of boredom and slight distaste — balanced out some by the film’s incredible visuals. Today? Well, it’s still not exactly the sort of thing I naturally gravitate toward, but in the greater context of Malick films I’ve seen, it’s a very different proposition than it would be as a stand-alone work. Out of that context, Days of Heaven has a quality that is not far removed from the best of the late era silent films. Aspects of it — especially the way that the film is so grounded in the landscape — actually remind me of F.W. Murnau’s City Girl (1930). But there’s something more primitive about Malick film — or perhaps I should say “primal.” And that’s where seeing it as part of a larger body of work comes into play. Having a greater sense of Malick interests and concerns of film as something other than a medium for telling stories, he attempts to place the viewer in the context of the film, to feel what the characters feel, experience what they experience, see this world as they see it.
The question arises: Does the attempt work? Not entirely — at least for me — but I admire the attempt, and appreciate the fact that it sometimes does work. Malick seems to me to be approaching film more like music than anything else — and that’s perhaps why the things I take away from his films are connected to his use of music and image. Whether it’s Smetana’s “Moldau” and Mahler’s First Symphony in The Tree of Life, Wagner’s Das Rheingold in The New World, or Saint-Saens’ “Carnival of the Animals” here, these are the things most etched into my brain by the films. The story is almost incidental. The problem with this — apart from baffling the audience expecting a story — is that Malick notions of evoking a universal experience is limited by his own sense of those experiences. (Frankly, I never got the rapturous joy Malick appears to get out of aimlessly running around in a field — which is apparently his vision of happiness.) This isn’t to say that he’s incapable of creating more traditional drama. Consider the locust plague here — and it’s not so much the big scenes I’m talking about. Look at the way it starts and builds on the reality of what’s happening with subtly increasing dread. This is the work of a filmmaker perfectly capable of crafting a film in a classical manner. He just doesn’t choose to.
The Hendersonville Film Society will show Days of Heaven Sunday, Feb. 17 at 2 p.m. in the Smoky Mountain Theater at Lake Pointe Landing Retirement Community (behind Epic Cinemas), 333 Thompson St., Hendersonville.
In Brief: Terrence Malick’s second film, Days of Heaven, is almost impossible to critique in normal terms. As drama, it’s not entirely satisfactory in the usual sense. Its story is at once simple and rambling. It feels a lot more like a late period silent movie than something from 1978, but even that doesn’t describe it adequately. It’s less something to watch than something to experience for both visual beauty and Malick’s unique sense of film as a living embodiment of capturing the smallest details of place and making them indelible. It is not going to be to everyone’s taste.