
After seven hours of testimony, public comment and deliberation Wednesday night, the Buncombe County Board of Adjustment voted unanimously to deny a conditional-use permit for a concrete plant proposed for north Buncombe County.
Blue Ridge Concrete, an offshoot of a Savannah-based company, applied nearly a year ago for a permit to build a plant on Murphy Hill Road near the intersection with Old Mars Hill Highway. Since then, neighbors of the site have argued that the area, though open zoned, is actually a residential community unfit for a concrete plant’s industrial nature. (Pictured at right is the site of the proposed plant.)
Community activist Martha Claxton, organizer of the North Buncombe Community of Concerned Citizens, said that she was elated with the 7-0 vote to refuse the permit. She’d expected a victory, she added, but not necessarily such a decisive one.
Roughly 300 people showed up at the hearing held at North Buncombe Middle School, a site picked after a March hearing venue was too small to fit the turnout of opposition.
Meanwhile, Blue Ridge Concrete still owns the Murphy Hill Road property, but there is no word as to what is next for the company. Owner Mark Turner had no comment after the decision.
Look for full coverage in the May 21 issue of Xpress.
— Brian Postelle, staff writer
Commenters email addresses are never displayed. Please do not insert HTML code.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (without http://) and it will be active.
|
Hooray! |
May 15, 2008 at |
|
OK, so where CAN they build their plant? |
May 15, 2008 |
|
Ummm, not in a residential area, or one which will be one soon |
May 15, 2008 at |
|
How about down where the county gave Progress the land for a buck? |
May 15, 2008 at |
|
Is that in a location where the product being manufactured can meet the local demand? |
May 15, 2008 |
|
Travelah loves him some concrete plant. |
Gordon Smith May 15, 2008 |
|
More specifically travelah, not in a residential area on a narrow, winding road heavily trafficked by school buses from the four schools within two miles. That clarify it for you? This wasn’t a NIMBY issue for me, it was a safety issue. For example, the DOT guy hired by Blue Ridge Concrete said the road was 18 feet wide (which they actually aren’t) and the trucks were 8 1/2 ft. wide. They can build their plant up the road on Monticello Rd. where there are already heavy industrial plants with easy access to the interstate. |
May 15, 2008 at |
|
BTW, the only local demand for mass amounts of concrete is the new Wal-Mart and Lowe’s that are being constructed off Weaver Blvd. |
May 15, 2008 at |
|
methinks travelah doesnt really have any political stances of his own. that is, beyond being against anything the xpress reports on. |
djresteep May 15, 2008 |
|
bobaloo, that is all and well, but what is happening is NIMBY. Concrete is used in a wide assortment of construction projects. About the only thing that doesn’t use it in some fashion is a stick built house erected over a dirt floor and that better not have a modern fireplace and flue. It remains for somebody to suggest where a suitable place for a commercial concrete facility can be located here in the Asheville area. Where would you locate it with the understandng that the supply is needed? A lot of people wish to object and sputter juvenile comments but the issue needs a solution rather than a “no” and then sticking heads in the sand. dj, I am satisfied with the verdict against Medford given the evidence presented. |
May 15, 2008 |
|
okay, travelah… where would you put it? |
May 15, 2008 at |
|
travelah, Obviously you didn’t read my first post, as you didn’t respond to a single point I laid out. See the part about the width of the road and the proximity of four schools, then continue on to this part: |
May 15, 2008 at |
|
Oh, plus I didn’t know north Buncombe had a dire shortage of concrete. |
May 15, 2008 at |
|
from what I can tell there is not shortage anywhere around here |
May 15, 2008 at |
|
bobaloo, your post with the Monticello Road suggestion had not appeared for me to read until just now. My apologies if I overlooked something. I have not stated that the plant should be built at the location they requested. I have no problem with the decision. My inquiry is where will it go OR will another group step up and try to block it no matter where it goes? Given this company was willing to make the investment in the facility, I suspect they know more than we regarding supply and demand of the product they are investing in. As for where I think it needs to go, it should be located within a 30-60 minute drop at it’s various destinations and not in a residential zoned area. |
May 15, 2008 |
|
travelah, Gotcha, I see some posts lag too. My inquiry is where will it go OR will another group step up and try to block it no matter where it goes? FYI, it was the N. Buncombe Assoc. of Concerned Citizens that proposed the Monticello area during th hearing last night. It’s home to four heavy industrial sites already. We’re not against it wholly, just somewhere logical. As far as demand, if people want concrete, I’m certain there’s no issue in getting it. |
May 15, 2008 at |
|
travelah is just waiting for somebody to say ‘we dont need concrete’, or something in the vein. |
djresteep May 16, 2008 |
|
Glad it got stopped in that location. |
cwaster May 16, 2008 |
|
dj, there have already been a couple of posts that hint at that very notion. I didn’t have to wait at all. |
May 17, 2008 |
|
Actually, both those posts were mine and I said that there’s plenty of concrete to go around, not that it wasn’t needed. |
May 18, 2008 at |
|
bobaloo, ashevillein wrote: It was not just yourself, hence a couple of comments. The not needed comment relates to supply, yes? |
May 18, 2008 |
|
Affordable housing requires concrete! |
May 21, 2008 |